Tuesday, 19th July 2022
Mr Paul Forbes
Tower One – International Towers Sydney
Level 46, 100 Barangaroo Avenue
Barangaroo NSW 2000
Dear Mr Forbes
Re: Law Society of NSW – covering up of criminal conduct
I refer to your letter of 12th July 2022 and my two E-mail responses to such of that same date. Despite my request for clarity or proof of the assertions made, you have provided neither comment nor response.
For terms of reference let us firstly go to the crux of this matter. On 23rd June 2010, Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers filed an Application for Assessment of Solicitor/Client Costs with the Supreme Court of NSW. In his application to the Court, Mr Goldberg improperly and fraudulently states that he acted for the four plaintiffs together with the sixth defendant in Supreme Court proceedings as heard on 27th November 2009. As you and your clients well know, Mr Goldberg acted for the four plaintiffs only in such.
Both you and your clients are further aware that Terence Goldberg having fraudulently obtained a judgment debt against the party who was not his client, and in concert with another, clandestinely created two entities in the guise of charities to siphon into all further monies as owned by that same party for whom he did not act (as well as placing other monies of an unknown origin into one of those entities).
Coming back to your letter of 12th July 2022, wherein you state you act for the Law Society of NSW. In such letter, you claim that both your firm and your client are harassed by my writing to you, and it, in relation to the above. You also claim that your client has legitimate concerns regarding my making public of the above.
However, and as is your way, you decline to provide any evidence of the said harassment and you decline to provide your client’s legitimate concerns. Sadly, I am well used to these tactics.
As you are aware, I wrote to Ms Radhika Withana of counsel on 8th April 2019 regarding not only Mr Goldberg’s unlawful activities, but also the covering up of such by (both your client and) the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner. I attach a copy of that letter*.
Now, as you know, such letter to Ms Withana is calm, detailed, and factual, however, some mere weeks later, John McKenzie, the Legal Services Commissioner, in an act of apparent retaliation and while also claiming to be ‘harassed’ by my writing to him, sent two police officers to my front door carrying the instruction that I was to cease writing regarding the above, or if I were not to do so criminal proceedings would be commenced against me. Of course, no such criminal proceedings ensued. (I have never been the subject of any criminal proceeding.)
You know, too, of the several threats as made against me by your firm that Supreme Court proceedings would be commenced against me with no further notice to myself, and you are aware also that your firm was unable to provide me with the basis of those said proceedings, or indeed of any particular whatsoever of the many claims as made against me.
In exactly the same vein, you and your firm are now unable to provide me with the ‘legitimate concerns’ as now supposedly held by your clients. Quite simply, there are none to provide. Barren threats and baseless assertions it seems are normal practice and are made with a simple backward wave of a hand, and with no consequence to speak of.
In previous correspondences, your firm has variously described the contents of letters to your clients as ‘false, misleading, defamatory, and highly defamatory’ and further that the making public thereof is intended to cause ‘grave and serious harm as well as causing significant distress and hurt to feelings’ yet you and your firm are unable to substantiate one single contention as made. Baker McKenzie’s allegations have not been made in good faith and are without merit, with such straining or even leaping beyond the bounds of credibility.
Many years ago I learned that rising to meet an aggressor was futile and in the face of aggression a calm head was required. As you know and despite the truculence shown by the many who are attempting to cover up the criminal activities of Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers, I have remained steadfastly calm at all times and have never once veered from the truth or the base of the matter. Apart from the barrage of somewhat hysterical rhetoric and general noise from parties such as yourselves, not one single person has been able to identify or refer to one single untrue statement as made by myself, and yet you have the impudence to claim that I have entered into a ‘campaign of harassment’.
It is my understanding that E-mails to your firm and to the Law Society have now been blocked. This is a manoeuvre used solely and deliberately to prevent the dissemination of information, and has been done so as I have written to others within your law firm and the Law Society of NSW regarding the cover up that is taking place; and as above have done so calmly and factually, and without embellishment of any kind.
Let us turn our minds for a moment to the letter you wrote to me in February 2017 as instructed by Ms Pauline Wright, then President of the Law Society of NSW, with you too threatening me with Supreme Court proceedings for my making public of Terence Goldberg’s criminal activities and the Law Society’s covering up of such. Ms Wright is now a Local Court Magistrate. My concern at these events borders on ineffable, such is the magnitude. The gravity of such cannot be overstated.
You were personally made aware of Mr Goldberg’s criminal activities and of both Ms Wright’s and the Law Society’s covering up of such at that precise time and despite such you continue in your campaign of intimidation and calumny while attempting to protect both the wrongdoing and the wrongdoers. Further, and quite naturally, such contemptible and venal conduct can not and will not go unopposed. Integrity must enter into the narrative.
It has become increasingly obvious that what we have operating within the heart of the legal profession is a cabal intent on subjugating the rule of law. Baker McKenzie is quite evidently part of that cabal.
The putrefaction within our legal system appears to run as wide as it does deep.